Security Executive Blog

We are continuing our analysis of the DSS’ The Self-Inspection Handbook for NISP Contractors to determine requirements and best practices for meeting them. Since Section M has multiple inspection points, we have broken them up into individual articles.  This update addresses using warning signs and inspections to ensure authorized introduction and removal of classified information.  Question 5-103: Are signs posted at all entries and exits warning that anyone entering or departing is subject to an inspection of their personal effects?   NISPOM 5-103 states “…The fact that persons who enter or depart the facility are subject to an inspection of their personal effects shall be conspicuously posted at all pertinent entries and exits.” Security through Denial, Deterrence, and Detection This notification is designed to both serve as a warning or deterrent to unauthorized introduction or removal of classified information. The actual inspection of p...

This section continues our discussion of the DSS’ The Self-Inspection Handbook for NISP Contractors. We are still addressing Section M, classified storage. This update addresses perimeter controls that deter and detect unauthorized removal and introduction of classified information. 5-103 Is a system of perimeter controls maintained to deter or detect unauthorized introduction or removal of classified information from the facility? If so, when, where, and how are these being implemented? According to NISPOM 5-103. Perimeter Controls. Contractors authorized to store classified material shall establish and maintain a system to deter and detect unauthorized introduction or removal of classified material from their facility . Traceability is an important part of protecting classified information. There is plenty of allusion in industry best practices, NISPOM , and training that only TOP SECRET information is to be accountable. There is tremendous direction for application of...