Posts

Security through walking around

Perhaps you have already used this term or have at least heard others refer to it on occasion. I have read several articles concerning the subject and am, quite frankly, a fan of the idea. For those new to the term, it means turn off the computer and show your smiling face. If you spend your day processing information at your computer, you don’t get the full security picture. If you only get out to play “gotcha” or to conduct preliminary inquiries into violations, then those you serve only get a partial picture of you. Security through walking around requires a plan. Without the plan you are just milling about engaging in conversation and basically, wasting everyone’s time. A plan will keep you focused as well as prevent the temptations to have conversations and activities that can cause you to lose credibility. The plan doesn’t have to be complicated or lengthy. It just helps direct your purpose, attention and answers questions about your security program’s health. T...

DoD Security and Executive Order 13434

Image
Have you taken the next step to being competitive in the security and intelligence arena? If not, this article will provide information and tips based on a proven method of studying for and passing the exam. Why earn a security certification? There are several reasons to achieve certification. One of which allows security managers to take advantage of opportunities offered in the recent Presidential Executive Order: National Security Professional Development. The Executive order states: "In order to enhance the national security of the United States...it is the policy of the United States to promote the education, training, and experience of current and future professionals in national security positions (security professionals)..." The National Strategy identified in the Executive Order provides a plan to give security professionals access to education, training to increase their professional experience in efforts to increase their skill level and ability to protec...

An idea about violations

I was just thinking about the myriad security violations that could have been prevented by using good operations security, communication between cleared co-workers and practicing lessons learned during security training. Once of the biggest culprits of a well rounded security program is the lack of available security violation statistics. There are resources for discovering spy stories or data on espionage, but as far as information about the most common types of violations, mistakes, oversights, etc. the data does not seem to be there. We can’t learn from mistakes if we don’t know what the mistakes are. Good security managers have data of security breaches, violations, reports of compromise or suspected compromise. However, this data rarely leaves their office. Because of the sensitive nature, it is held closely either for fear of retribution or fear of embarrassment. In truth, there is no retribution for security violation reports and information contained could be very valuabl...

Those warning labels

I am currently working on Chapter Five of my new book, "Managing the Security of Classified Information and Contracts". Chapter Five reviews the Executive Orders and regulations relating to Classification Markings and there is some good information from all sources. I believe this good information is fundamental to the profession of Intelligence and Security Officers. Understanding why and how information is classified is vital to knowing exactly what to protect and how. There are a few hard and fast rules for classifying information. In cases where items may be assigned an original classification, four conditions must be met. • An original classification authority is applying the classification level • The U.S. Government owns, is producing, or is controlling the information • Information meets one of eight categories • The Original Classification Authority determines unauthorized disclosure could cause damage to national security to include transnational terrorism and they ...

Kicking Down Institutional Walls

Image
A critical review of security books By: Jeffrey W. Bennett, ISP, Author of: ISP Certification-The Industrial Security Professional Exam Manual and Under the Lontar Palm This book commands attention! The authors bring to light current security practices, methods and decision analysis and their many shortcomings. The authors' thesis; to provide sound argument toward a more modern and effective way of implementing security practices. The ideas are easy to apply, but contrary to what is taught by security seminars and vendors selling security products. While security seminars and education efforts teach cataclysmic results of security breaches, "New School" demonstrates the need for collecting data to assess the threat in a scientific manner. Shostack and Stewart champion going back to raw data to identify the threats and then develop programs to address those threats. Aside from evidence related to loss, espionage or other threats, risk managers cannot effecti...
Pentagon analyst Gregg William Bergersen, was recently sentenced to 57 months in prison for providing information classified at the SECRET level to the People's Republic of China. The information was classified SECRET, thus having the potential to cause serious damage to national security. The complicated espionage operation involved not only native born U.S. Citizens, but foreign born as well. Though this ring involved several people both U.S. and Non-U.S. citizens, let us spend our focus on the the cleared U.S. Citizen Mr. Bergersen. The foreign operative received the largest sentence, however, let us not waste time tracking them, they are paid to spy and we have agencies dedicated to catching spies. We as security managers entrusted with safeguarding classified information, have to clean up our own back yards. Proactive security specialists are constantly on the look out for indicators of employee espionage. We cannot prevent employees from being corrupted with recruitment, bu...

How important are those receipts?

I recently went through an annual audit with the Defense Security Services while working on my full time job as an FSO for a Defense Contractor. I have always held dear the responsibility of implementing a security program designed to protect classified material. In that role, I try to create a positive environment while remaining vigilant of suspicious activities and possible compromise. During the course of the inspection, my attention was directed to our company's lack of warning sign. This sign was to be posted reminding employees and visitors that their personal effects are subject to search. I agreed that the NISPOM requires such a posting, but I did not understand how a sign would be helpful. We re-opened the NISPOM to try to better understand the intent. The sign is part of the program to prevent unauthorized introduction or removal of classified material from a contractor facility. I had only understood half of the intent, to prevent unauthorized removal. With the full und...